Managing Your Portfolio of Contract Solicitation Opportunities

Not sure if you should bid on that government contract solicitation you just received?  Do you feel confident that your qualifications and experience meet the scope of work requirements?  Do the chances of winning the contract justify your time filling out all those government forms and answering all those RFP questions?

Well, as usual, you are not alone.

You’ve got an important decision to make and government contract solicitations typically don’t give you much time to respond.  And they’re very demanding in how you respond.  Forget to fill-out a form, or properly address a question (direct or implied) and they WILL either kick your proposal to the curb (aka declare you “unresponsive”) or subtract prized evaluation points from your bid and maybe award the contract to your competitor.

So, do you just a take chance, jump in and hope for the best?  REALLY?  Is that how you handle your personal finances . . . just tell your accountant or broker “let it ride on Enron and hope for the best?” Perhaps you should think of a better way to manage your portfolio of contract solicitation opportunities.

Investopedia tells us that “portfolio management is the art and science of making decisions about investment mix and policy, matching investments to objectives, asset allocation […] and balancing risk against performance.”  They sum it up nicely by saying “Portfolio management is all about determining strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats” in choices.

What’s true about financial portfolio management is also true for responding to the right government contract solicitation.  You are investing your organization’s time, resources and money on a chance to win a contract.  Like stocks and bonds, you need to select the right contract solicitations that reflect your risk tolerance, meaning how much resources are you willing to put on the line for a contract you might not win? Also important for winning contracts, you must select those opportunities that are most compatible to your organization’s capabilities and qualifications.

And like selecting stocks and bonds, a common mistake in picking contract solicitations is making incorrect assessments.  What I mean by that, for contract solicitations, is that if you are not careful, you will misinterpret the requirements listed in the opportunity’s statement of work requirements.

All too often we read what we want to see in a solicitation, not what’s in there.  And many times, as we read a solicitation, we jump right into thinking what the solicitation SHOULD be requesting, not what it is ACTUALLY asking.  It’s all too easy and natural for us to say, oh, they should really be asking for this and not that or thinking that your organization’s way for addressing a problem is better than what the solicitation is looking to implement. Continue with that train of thought and you are on your way to not winning the contract.

It doesn’t matter if your approach, method, product or solution is the best thing since sliced bread or toilet paper.   Remember, that old adage, the customer is always right?  It doesn’t mean you follow them blindly.  It just increases your chances to stay in the game, to be the one given a chance to change minds after you win the bid.

The key to success here is that you must line up the solicitation’s stated requirements (whether you agree with them or not) against what your organization can (or is willing) provide.  Make it a cold-hearted yes or no assessment.  Only after you have done that will you be in a better position to determine if that solicitation should be added to your portfolio of contract opportunities you intend to risk your time, resources and money to win.  But you knew that already, right?

Well, I’m not so sure about that since several people told me that the client would be better off with their solution and not what is stated in the solicitation.  Funny thing is that they followed up with, why wasn’t their stellar solution not chosen?   So, I decided to post this blog.

Simple as that.  Well, not so. . .   Next week, I’ll post an easy tool you can use to help you make that honest assessment and decide if you should invest your time, resources and money to respond to that contract solicitation.  Stay tuned or follow my blog for the tool.


WANTED! A Lean Process Improvement Trainer

I’m looking for a lean process improvement subject matter expert to join our team for a contract opportunity. This person should have in-depth experience with public state and/or federal agencies. Work includes helping/training our client to put in place lean decision making processes for improved project execution efficiencies.

Please contact me if interested or feel free to forward this opportunity to your network. This is a quick response contract opportunity, so we need to hear from you now!

Bid vs. Proposal What’s the Difference?

While scanning State and Federal agency contracting sites, I’ve seen different uses of the words “bid” and “proposal.”  From the contractor/supplier point of view, these terms may seem interchangeable.  Indeed, it even seems that some government contracting agencies use these terms as synonyms. In the second edition of his 2016 book, “Contracting for Services in State and Local Government Agencies,” William Sims Curry tells us that in a 2015 research project, only 73% of contracting agencies reported that “they used the term ‘proposal’ exclusively when referring to contractor responses to RFPs.”

Bid vs. Proposal, What Is the difference?

From a best-practice prospective, there is a significant difference between these two words.  Using these terms as synonyms could lead to misunderstandings of a government agency’s intention in terms of how the information contained in Request for Proposals (RFP) or Invitation for Bids (IFB) responses will be treated.  Such confusion can lead to contractor/supplier protest, resulting in delayed decisions and unwanted legal actions and publicity.   Curry tells us that “these terms cannot be used interchangeably because each type of solicitation is unique and subject to differing rules.”

So here are the rules for using “bid” and “proposal.”

The word “bid” should only be used to describe a response to an IFB or Request for Bid (RFB).  These solicitations are typically straight forward initiatives to secure commodities, capital equipment or construction work and normally not services.  Bid responses are always subject to disclosure at public openings and are not subject to (price, terms & condition, timing, etc.) negotiation.

On the other hand, the term “proposal” is only used to describe a response to a RFP, which is used primarily to secure services or a combination of products and services. RFPs are more complex than IFBs or RFBs due to the nature of their requirement, which can be satisfied in different ways.  The RFP is designed to help the contracting agency understand the various proposed methods and approaches that can be used to meet the requirement.  The variability of responses may include information considered proprietary, confidential, sensitive or a competitive secret by the proposing contractor/supplier.  For that reason, and the fact that provisions of the proposal are subject to negotiations, the details provided in contractor proposal responses are typically not subject to immediate public disclosure.   The reason for this is that the contracting agency, after reviewing a proposed approach to satisfying the RFP requirement, may desire changes to a prospective contractor’s approach in terms of timing, methodology, resourcing, objectives, cost, etc.   The contractor recommended by the contracting agency will most likely be selected if both parties can agree to the changes.

So, What Does This Mean To You?

If you are the contracting agent, you will want to adhere to the described usages of the terms “bid” and “proposal.”  If, for any reason, you cannot then make sure to at least clearly state your intention of how the information contained in received proposal and bid responses will be disclosed.  Government agencies tend to be bound by laws requiring more transparency than private corporations when it comes to disclosing responses. I have seen options offered by governmental agencies to allow contractors to submit a redacted version of their proposals to satisfy the need for subsequent public disclosure of RFP responses.

If you are a contractor/supplier, know that not all contracting agencies adhere to the same usage/treatment of the terms “bid” and “proposal” as described in this blog.  You may want to reconsider responding to a RFP where the contracting agency or organization intends to disclose sensitive information contained in your response to the public—and your competitors.  Most contracting agencies do not publicly disclose proposal information prior to contractor selection. However, after a contractor has been selected, proposals are normally subject to public release rules unless the contractor marked certain portions of its proposal as “proprietary.” Contracting agencies normally reserve the right to determine whether information marked “proprietary” by the contractor is actually proprietary. There are ways to mitigate this risk but you will want to read the nitty gritty details contained in that RFP. In any case, you should submit written questions to the contracting agency requesting clarification.

Lifecycle To Winning That RFP – Part 2

This is the second of my three blog series that describe the essential elements to winning that Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request for Quotation (RFQ).  I’ve boiled down the lifecycle to winning a RFP or RFQ into three main phases: Identify, Qualify and Respond.  

The first blog installment described challenges and suggestions to identify RFP or RFQ solicitations.  This second installment addresses the question – “But is that RFP or RFQ solicitation you found really for you?”


There’s a growing number of contract opportunities across all disciplines such as: Information Technology, construction, education, transportation, training, management consulting, landscaping, janitorial, marketing and all sorts of commodities.  So, when you find out about a juicy contract opportunity, you may be tempted to jump right in and crank out a response.

Problem is, not all contract opportunities you receive are meant for you.  Just because a RFP calls for a service or product you provide, searching in the darkdon’t think your organization is the best candidate.  Unless you can figure out a way to assess your chances of winning those opportunities, you will waste a lot of time, money and resources responding to proposal solicitations you will never win.

Avoid searching for the right RFP or RFQ opportunity in the dark.  You need to shine a light that shines way beyond the obvious question of whether you can satisfy the scope of work. For example, consider these three questions in terms of your organization’s: goals/objectives, culture, size, industry, etc.

  • What is the real purpose of the RFP or RFQ solicitation? Does the contractor really want your business or is s/he just price checking to ensure that a preferred vendor’s offer is competitively priced?
  • How important is relative experience in the industry represented by the RFP or RFQ contractor? I’m not talking about the industry inferred by the scope of work requirements but rather the organization that issued the solicitation.
  • Can the “size” of the project be perceived to outweigh the “size” of your organization in the eyes of the RFP or RFQ contractor’s vendor response evaluation person or committee?

There are many more considerations, some of which I described further in another blog post.  You will certainly want to tailor your scrutiny to fit your organization. But please remember this one important fact.  Only when you understand the complete story behind that RFP or RFQ solicitation will you be able to decide if it is the right one for you.

OK, now that you have selected the right RFP or RFQ that truly fits your business, it’s time to craft a winning response.  I’ll talk about that in my next blog post.

Want to know more? Can’t wait for my next blog entry on the lifecycle to winning that RFP response?  Then check out this link to my website that describes my services around this need.


Lifecycle To Winning That RFP – Part 1

Winning that Request for Proposal or Quotation (RFP or RFQ) is not an easy thing to do.  It’s a large numbers game where you have to carefully select the right opportunity then figure out how to get your message across in a way that gives your organization the most vendor evaluation scoring points.

To help make things a bit easier, I’ve boiled down the lifecycle to winning a RFP or RFQ into three main phases: Identify, Qualify and Respond.  I’ll talk a little about each in three separate blog posts.

This first installment concerns finding RFP or RFQ solicitations.


papers flyingLike potholes on the road, there are plenty of Request for Proposal or Quotation (RFP or RFQ) opportunities out there vying for your attention.  A casual search shows a growing number of contract opportunities across all disciplines such as: Information Technology, construction, education, transportation, training, management consulting, landscaping, janitorial, marketing, all sorts of commodities, etc.  The Internet is filled with search engine sites (BidsUSA and FindRFP to name a few) to notify you of RFP or RFQ opportunities that fit the conditions you specify. Be aware that some of these search services are paid subscription based.

For state and federal RFP opportunities, you can save a ton of money by registering your company on various state and federal government contracting sites.  There, you will get automated notifications of solicitations based on the industry classification codes you provide.  Registering your business with government contracting sites can be a complex, time consuming pain in the butt process with plenty of bureaucratic check points and hoops to jump through.  But in the end, it is worth the effort. You may even discover an opportunity to develop a one-on-one relationship with a government contracting agent, which may prove helpful to find opportunities that don’t require a published solicitation.

But is that RFP or RFQ solicitation you found really for you?  I’ll talk about that in my next blog post.  

Want to know more? Can’t wait for my next blog entry on the lifecycle to winning that RFP?  Then check out this link to my website that describes my services around this need.


Use EXTREME CAUTION When Giving Gifts to Government Contract Officials and Clients

IMG_1104Here are some important words that bears repeating about gifts to government clients.  Business owners, especially new ones who have not dealt with government clients before but now want to express their honest gratitude for that first or second government contract award, should pay close attention to this warning from William Curry, a government contracting expert, trainer and author of the book- Contracting for Services in State and Local Government Agencies, Second Edition.


Small businesses may have established a practice of sending thank you presents to their private sector customers. They should, however, reconsider this tradition when dealing with government agencies.

While researching contracting fraud cases for my book, I came across a newspaper article with a dateline naming a city where I previously lived. Upon reading the story, I was stunned to learn that my friend’s small business owner son was going to prison for giving gifts to government officials.

Did you know that the value of gifts that can be given to federal officials is surprisingly low at $20 per gift and no more than $50 per year from the same source? The limits vary greatly between the various state and local government agencies.

You may also be surprised to learn that the FBI traditionally has jurisdiction over procurement fraud cases for state and local governments as well as for federal agencies. When it comes to investigating contracting corruption, the FBI is a formidable institution. My recommendation: Don’t give gifts of any value to your government customers.


Once Upon A Time, There Was This RFP and . . .

Before you respond to a RFP/RFQ solicitation you should first know its complete story. Only then will you be able to answer the question- do you have a good chance of being selected?  OK, that’s obvious.

But what’s not so clear is knowing what goes into qualifying a RFP/RFQ opportunity as something worthy to bet your resources.

Last year, a small business owner put in a lot of time and effort to respond to thirty RFP/RFQ vendor solicitations- and won zero.  Turns out she responded to the wrong opportunities.  Even though her business could satisfy the requirements, she didn’t know the “story” behind those thirty RFPs.  If she had, she would never have responded.  Instead, she would have found other RFP/RFQ opportunities whose complete story is more compatible to her organization.

More importantly, she must realize that the real story often times has nothing to do with the RFP/RFQ’s scope of work requirements.  The story usually includes hidden themes that can outweigh scope of work requirements.

telling-a-story-1024x790So, gather your team and explore the theme(s) behind the RFP/RFQ solicitation’s story when it comes your way.  Your assessment should go way beyond the obvious question of whether you can satisfy the scope of work.  For example, consider how compatible these potential story themes are to your organization in terms of: goals/objectives, culture, size, industry, etc.

  1. What is the real purpose of the solicitation? Does the contractor really want your business or is s/he just price checking to ensure that a preferred vendor’s offer is competitively priced?
  2. How important is relative experience in the industry represented by the RFP/RFQ contractor? I’m not talking about the industry inferred by the scope of work requirements but rather the organization that issued the solicitation.
  3. Can the “size” of the project be perceived to outweigh the “size” of your organization in the eyes of the RFP/RFQ contractor’s vendor response evaluation person or committee?
  4. Given the apparent complexity of the RFP/RFQ opportunity, do you even want to deal with the organization that issued the solicitation?
  5. Does the overall scope of work seem like an uncoordinated/impractical wish list that is better off divided into more reasonable parcels?
  6. How does the projected timing of the work to be done compare to the contractor’s organizational budget cycle?

I can go on and on and on, but you get the idea.

So, what RFP/RFQ solicitation story themes can you think of?  Send your themes to me and I will share with everyone.


Do You Keep Missing The RFP Target?

Does This Sound Familiar?

The owner of a small services firm told me about how her business responded to thirty or so RFP solicitations. She spent time and effort carefully filling out the forms, crafting out a recommended approach and pricing to satisfy the requirements of those opportunities that were “right up her alley.”

And this is what she got for all that effort . . . zilch, nada (thing), diddly-squat! She was, however, invited to explain to her partners and investors why she wasted their time and money.

So What Happened?
Hearing more about her approach, it turns out that she should not have responded to any of those thirty RFP opportunities. Why? Even though those opportunities were in her firm’s areas of expertise, they were not a good fit for reasons that had nothing to do with the scope of work defined in those RFPs.

Just because you find out about an RFP or RFQ opportunity, that doesn’t mean it is an opportunity for you.  But make no mistake about it. Winning competitive RFP/RFQs is a game of large numbers. You’ve got to be in as many of these opportunity bubbles as possible. The question is, which ones won’t pop on you?

So, consider my 10% theory. No matter how good your organization is, even if your product or service is the best thing since sliced bread, you still must have at least ten RFP/RFQ responses going just to win one. Question is . . . which ten? Obviously the business owner described above responded to the wrong RFP/RFQ opportunities.

Bottom Line: Think Twice Before You Respond To Any RFP Solicitation!

In my next blog, I’ll talk about how and why you need to understand the true story behind a RFP solicitation before you respond to it.

Hit The Right Target! It’s Time to Reread The RFP Requirements.

Happy Holidays & Winter Solstice All!

I’ve neglected my blogging chores recently, having been busy helping a few clients respond to some state government bidding opportunities before the end of the year.  But, now I’m back and want to share with you a funny experience I had the other day while scanning through a bunch of new opportunities.  It’s literally an eye opening experience that we all should keep in mind!

Now, we all understand that knowing the Request for Proposal (RFP) stated requirements is critical to being selected.  But literally hundreds of state/federal solicitations fly across my iPad screen . . . each one begging my eyes to scan through and assess their need.  But, I don’t have time to read these requests word-for-bloody-word!

So, while speed reading through the requirements, I noted that a potential RFP opportunity is looking for a vendor to conduct SWAT training.  Now, in my head and from a halcyonic prespective, that acronym sounded like Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunity and Threats, an area where my client excels.  Ding, ding, ding, this is a slam dunk!  I can writeup a proposal for my client quickly and get ready for Christmas. Yea, buddy!

But, fortunately, the analytic geek inside of me decided to look into this further . . . slower . . . more intently.  After rereading the solicitation, and this time going all the way down the bottom of the page, it turns out the RFP solicitation actually wants someone to conduct Special Weapons & Tactics training . . . a totally different target (and client).

Lesson learned: read, re-read, then read it again!

Did you have a similar experience?